TSTP Solution File: DAT282^1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : DAT282^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 05:06:21 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.33s
% Output   : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   19
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (   9 unt;  16 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   38 (  10 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    8 (   7   ~;   0   |;   0   &;   0   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   26 (  23   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   16 (  14 usr;   1 con; 0-6 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   0   ^  10   !;   4   ?;  23   :)
%                                         (   9  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    'type/ind_types/list': $tType > $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    'type/pair/prod': ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(type_def_7,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(type_def_8,type,
    sK0: $tType ).

thf(type_def_9,type,
    sK1: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    'type/pair/prod': ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    'type/ind_types/list': $tType > $tType ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    'const/lists/ZIP': 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( 'type/ind_types/list'(X0) > 'type/ind_types/list'(X1) > 'type/ind_types/list'('type/pair/prod'(X0,X1)) ) ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    'const/ind_types/NIL': 
      !>[X0: $tType] : 'type/ind_types/list'(X0) ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    kCOMB: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X0 > X1 > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    bCOMB: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType,X2: $tType] : ( ( X1 > X2 ) > ( X0 > X1 ) > X0 > X2 ) ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    vOR: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    vEQ: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f39]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    'const/ind_types/NIL'('type/pair/prod'(sK0,sK1)) != 'const/ind_types/NIL'('type/pair/prod'(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(superposition,[],[f9,f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X1: $tType,X0: $tType,X2: 'type/ind_types/list'(X1)] : ( vAPP('type/ind_types/list'(X1),'type/ind_types/list'('type/pair/prod'(X0,X1)),vAPP('type/ind_types/list'(X0),sTfun('type/ind_types/list'(X1),'type/ind_types/list'('type/pair/prod'(X0,X1))),'const/lists/ZIP'(X0,X1),'const/ind_types/NIL'(X0)),X2) = 'const/ind_types/NIL'('type/pair/prod'(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0: $tType,X1: $tType,X2: 'type/ind_types/list'(X1)] : ( vAPP('type/ind_types/list'(X1),'type/ind_types/list'('type/pair/prod'(X0,X1)),vAPP('type/ind_types/list'(X0),sTfun('type/ind_types/list'(X1),'type/ind_types/list'('type/pair/prod'(X0,X1))),'const/lists/ZIP'(X0,X1),'const/ind_types/NIL'(X0)),X2) = 'const/ind_types/NIL'('type/pair/prod'(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','thm/lists/ZIP_DEF_0') ).

thf(f9,plain,
    'const/ind_types/NIL'('type/pair/prod'(sK0,sK1)) != vAPP('type/ind_types/list'(sK1),'type/ind_types/list'('type/pair/prod'(sK0,sK1)),vAPP('type/ind_types/list'(sK0),sTfun('type/ind_types/list'(sK1),'type/ind_types/list'('type/pair/prod'(sK0,sK1))),'const/lists/ZIP'(sK0,sK1),'const/ind_types/NIL'(sK0)),'const/ind_types/NIL'(sK1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    'const/ind_types/NIL'('type/pair/prod'(sK0,sK1)) != vAPP('type/ind_types/list'(sK1),'type/ind_types/list'('type/pair/prod'(sK0,sK1)),vAPP('type/ind_types/list'(sK0),sTfun('type/ind_types/list'(sK1),'type/ind_types/list'('type/pair/prod'(sK0,sK1))),'const/lists/ZIP'(sK0,sK1),'const/ind_types/NIL'(sK0)),'const/ind_types/NIL'(sK1)),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( 'const/ind_types/NIL'('type/pair/prod'(X0,X1)) != vAPP('type/ind_types/list'(X1),'type/ind_types/list'('type/pair/prod'(X0,X1)),vAPP('type/ind_types/list'(X0),sTfun('type/ind_types/list'(X1),'type/ind_types/list'('type/pair/prod'(X0,X1))),'const/lists/ZIP'(X0,X1),'const/ind_types/NIL'(X0)),'const/ind_types/NIL'(X1)) )
   => ( 'const/ind_types/NIL'('type/pair/prod'(sK0,sK1)) != vAPP('type/ind_types/list'(sK1),'type/ind_types/list'('type/pair/prod'(sK0,sK1)),vAPP('type/ind_types/list'(sK0),sTfun('type/ind_types/list'(sK1),'type/ind_types/list'('type/pair/prod'(sK0,sK1))),'const/lists/ZIP'(sK0,sK1),'const/ind_types/NIL'(sK0)),'const/ind_types/NIL'(sK1)) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( 'const/ind_types/NIL'('type/pair/prod'(X0,X1)) != vAPP('type/ind_types/list'(X1),'type/ind_types/list'('type/pair/prod'(X0,X1)),vAPP('type/ind_types/list'(X0),sTfun('type/ind_types/list'(X1),'type/ind_types/list'('type/pair/prod'(X0,X1))),'const/lists/ZIP'(X0,X1),'const/ind_types/NIL'(X0)),'const/ind_types/NIL'(X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( 'const/ind_types/NIL'('type/pair/prod'(X0,X1)) = vAPP('type/ind_types/list'(X1),'type/ind_types/list'('type/pair/prod'(X0,X1)),vAPP('type/ind_types/list'(X0),sTfun('type/ind_types/list'(X1),'type/ind_types/list'('type/pair/prod'(X0,X1))),'const/lists/ZIP'(X0,X1),'const/ind_types/NIL'(X0)),'const/ind_types/NIL'(X1)) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    ! [X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( 'const/ind_types/NIL'('type/pair/prod'(X0,X1)) = vAPP('type/ind_types/list'(X1),'type/ind_types/list'('type/pair/prod'(X0,X1)),vAPP('type/ind_types/list'(X0),sTfun('type/ind_types/list'(X1),'type/ind_types/list'('type/pair/prod'(X0,X1))),'const/lists/ZIP'(X0,X1),'const/ind_types/NIL'(X0)),'const/ind_types/NIL'(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','thm/lists/ZIP_0') ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : DAT282^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 12:50:57 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.10/0.31  % (30773)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.32  % (30776)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.15/0.32  % (30774)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.32  % (30779)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.32  % (30776)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.32  % (30777)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.32  % (30778)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.32  % (30780)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.32  % (30775)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.32  % (30780)WARNING: Not using GeneralSplitting currently not compatible with polymorphic/higher-order inputs.
% 0.15/0.32  % Exception at run slice level
% 0.15/0.32  User error: Finite model buillding is currently not compatible with polymorphism or higher-order constructs% Exception at run slice level
% 0.15/0.32  User error: Finite model buillding is currently not compatible with polymorphism or higher-order constructs
% 0.15/0.32  
% 0.15/0.32  % Exception at run slice level
% 0.15/0.32  User error: Finite model buillding is currently not compatible with polymorphism or higher-order constructs
% 0.15/0.32  % (30780)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.32  % (30779)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.32  % (30778)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.32  % (30779)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-30773"
% 0.15/0.33  % (30776)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.33  % (30779)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.33  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.33  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.33  % (30779)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.33  % (30779)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.15/0.33  % (30779)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.33  
% 0.15/0.33  % (30779)Memory used [KB]: 763
% 0.15/0.33  % (30779)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.33  % (30779)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.15/0.33  % (30773)Success in time 0.014 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------